Friday, May 1, 2015

Incoming…:I – I think this should make things more clear to me about Kay and her position…

“I’m not a smart dog like you are but at least I don’t have a bad attitude”…

I think you are far more cunning than the fox.

Definition of attitude:  a settled way of thinking or feeling about someone or something, typically one that is reflected in a person's behavior; "she took a tough attitude toward other people's indulgences”…North American informal:  truculent or uncooperative behavior; a resentful or antagonistic manner.

I agree I do have an attitude and I intend maintaining my position.  Experience creates prejudice.

http://psychology.about.com/od/socialpsychology/a/attitudes.htm

An Emotional Component: How the object, person, issue or event makes you feel. – They make me feel as if I have no right to decide what happens in my own life, like I have to avail myself to their wants and desires.  I have no familial relationship to these people at all and have no intentions of giving them what they want freely.  It angers me they have no respect for my rights at all, they don’t ask and they just force themselves onto people.  I do have boundaries and I expect them to be respected.  They demand their rights and boundaries be respected but they fail to permit others theirs, ie they forced me to be sent to the hospital.  Just what Susan did to Kay in 1989 and repeatedly.  Kay does have a disability and she does have special rights, US Civil Code: 10801- 10805.  These are her rights in addition to her civil rights, 13 of them in the constitution giving her the right to her privacy, privacy of her personal life, and the right to make decisions about her own privacy, the ninth amendment.  It also gives her the right to publish things she writes regarding her own personal experiences publically, just as any novelist publishes his hokey works from someone else’s personal history.  In fact she has a right to stop these kinds of novel hackers from intruding on her privacy and even exposing those who abuse her personal history for their own personal profit, attempting to make the public believe those things were created for their benefit.  Kay also has a right to have the false things stated about her and her personality re-evaluated and to have those diagnoses thrust upon me about others, who were involved with her, restated to best reflect her true personality and not that of those who transferred their own self-hatred to her.   She feels her family and many of my friends have been the victims of trickery, the rapo game and the now I’ve got you, you sob.  Some of them have lost their lives in this serious game and she refuses to call it life because it is a psychologically distorted perception of life and how it should be conducted.  People who think otherwise, take life without discretion or guilt and find no need to absolve their guilt or justify what they are doing.  These people are dangerous of our way of life and if they are permitted to continue we will regress.  Hundreds of thousands of deaths are on their hands for the misrepresentation of the usefulness of these machines in our lives.  Better stated they have misrepresented the psychological benefit of most of the material they have inflicted upon the rest of society to deal with.  One only has to look at some of the scripts created to note they are what many viewers have been thinking on something they have viewed and the harm it inflicted on them.  Making these producers of these films pay higher taxes for producing and marketing these problems should be made necessary to fund the prevention and policing of these products after they are viewed and to aid those who have already fallen victim to these products.  In Kay’s opinion and many others agree, product liability is legally applicable.  What is the life of a 5 year old boy worth?  What would it be worth if it were their own?   

Life should be taken seriously.  If those who are abusing Ms Gibbs feel their lives are worthless, one may need to seek professional help.  Kay has never felt that way about her own life but others have made her feel that way and their behavior toward her makes her feel that way and she hates the things they have done to her.  Television has ruined her life and the little good received from it has not been worth it.  She feels we have all been abused by that machine and are being misused by it.  She thinks these profiteers and Government owe the victims of this monsterously sadistic machine, the $280 million dollars the government is doling out for more films, for damages to our lives, and as punishment those who have taken part in this flim-flam should have to clean it up.  First they abuse our minds with the radio and volumes of murderous thinking then they create another machine they claim will help us clear up the crap that was created in our minds, only to discover were began to act on those things we saw, sometimes killing accidently.  Now we have another machine they claim will take care of everything and it is only contributing to the problem and the clean-up is more detailed and problematic.  They failed to foresee our futures while looking ahead at their stock pile of money and investments but not to the devastation to our minds and brains or our children.  Kay hardly foresees how a halfway normal human being could possibly support people who abuse the brains and minds of the people around them, and just walk away, calling it entertainment, without taking some kind of action to stop the abuse.  What is even more interesting to me is how these people can continue to force themselves onto another to get these biopics and novels they claim belong to them, which they have never suffered one second for, or were ever involved in.  To me they are no different than the rapist on the street who pushes a woman or young child into a dark alley and proceeds to violate their bodies or the CEO who drives his supervisors to alcoholism and heart attacks just so he can keep his high paying job.  Severe penalties are enacted for these kinds of crimes, legally and psychologically. 

A Cognitive Component: Your thoughts and beliefs about the subject.  I believe the above statement covers this part of the definition.

A Cognitive Component: Your thoughts and beliefs about the subject.  I have chosen my attitude in order to protect my present and future behaviors.  I am reminded of the ourborous on this part of the definition.  I have been in that kind of cycle before and it is not always easy to get out of it.  I am still suffering for poor thinking on this.